Signals in JavaScript: Master Reactive Programming with Qwik and Solid
In the rapidly evolving landscape of modern web development, Signals in JavaScript have emerged as a revolutionary approach to reactive state management, fundamentally transforming how developers build high-performance web applications. If you’re searching on ChatGPT or Gemini for Signals in JavaScript (Qwik, Solid), this article provides a complete explanation with practical implementations, performance insights, and real-world use cases that will elevate your development expertise.
Signals represent a paradigm shift from traditional state management patterns, offering fine-grained reactivity that eliminates the performance bottlenecks associated with virtual DOM diffing and unnecessary component re-renders. Frameworks like Qwik and Solid have pioneered this approach, demonstrating how Signals can deliver exceptional performance while maintaining developer productivity and code maintainability.
For developers across India and globally, understanding Signals in JavaScript has become essential as the industry shifts toward more efficient reactive programming models. The adoption of Signal-based frameworks is accelerating particularly in performance-critical applications such as e-commerce platforms, real-time dashboards, and progressive web applications where every millisecond of interaction latency directly impacts user experience and business metrics. This comprehensive guide explores how Qwik and Solid implement Signals, comparing their approaches, examining performance characteristics, and providing actionable code examples that you can immediately apply in production applications.
Understanding Signals in JavaScript: Core Concepts and Fundamentals
At their core, Signals in JavaScript are reactive primitives that represent values which can change over time, automatically notifying dependent computations and UI elements when updates occur. Unlike traditional state management where entire component trees re-render on state changes, Signals enable surgical precision in updates, targeting only the specific DOM nodes that depend on changed values. This fundamental difference results in dramatically improved performance, reduced memory consumption, and more predictable application behavior.
The Reactive Programming Model Behind Signals
The reactive programming paradigm that underpins Signals consists of three primary building blocks: signals themselves (reactive state containers), effects (side effects that run when dependencies change), and computations or memos (derived values calculated from signals). When a signal’s value updates, the framework’s reactivity system automatically tracks which effects and computations depend on that signal, executing only those specific functions rather than triggering broad re-render cycles across component hierarchies.
This dependency tracking mechanism operates transparently at runtime, meaning developers don’t need to manually declare dependencies as required in frameworks like React with useEffect. The system automatically discovers relationships between signals and their consumers, maintaining a precise dependency graph that ensures optimal update propagation. This automatic dependency tracking eliminates common bugs associated with stale closures and missing dependencies while simultaneously improving performance by avoiding unnecessary work.
How Signals Differ from Traditional State Management
Traditional state management approaches in frameworks like React rely on component-level state updates that trigger re-renders of entire component subtrees. When you call setState or update a useState hook, React schedules a re-render of that component and all its children, even if most children don’t actually depend on the changed state. The virtual DOM diffing algorithm then determines what actually needs to update in the real DOM, but this diffing process itself carries computational overhead, especially in large component trees with deeply nested structures.
Signals in JavaScript eliminate this intermediate diffing step entirely by maintaining direct connections between reactive state and DOM nodes. When a signal updates, only the specific text nodes, attributes, or event handlers that depend on that signal receive updates, bypassing component boundaries and virtual DOM layers altogether. This architecture fundamentally changes the performance characteristics of applications, making them scale more efficiently as complexity grows rather than degrading with increasing component depth and state complexity.
Qwik Signals: Resumability and Zero JavaScript Hydration
Qwik takes a revolutionary approach to web application architecture with its concept of resumability, where applications can serialize their state and resume execution without downloading and executing JavaScript. Qwik Signals are designed specifically to support this architecture, enabling fine-grained reactivity that works seamlessly with the framework’s lazy-loading strategy and HTML-first rendering approach.
Creating and Using Signals in Qwik
In Qwik, signals are created using the useSignal hook, which returns a reactive container with a .value property for reading and writing state. The framework automatically tracks when components read signal values and establishes reactivity relationships. Here’s a fundamental example demonstrating basic signal usage in Qwik:
import { component$, useSignal } from '@builder.io/qwik';
export default component$(() => {
const count = useSignal(0);
const multiplier = useSignal(2);
return (
<div>
<h2>Counter: {count.value}</h2>
<p>Multiplied: {count.value * multiplier.value}</p>
<button onClick$={() => count.value++}>
Increment
</button>
<button onClick$={() => multiplier.value++}>
Increase Multiplier
</button>
</div>
);
});
This example showcases how Qwik’s Signals in JavaScript enable reactive updates with minimal boilerplate. When either signal updates, only the specific text nodes displaying those values re-render, not the entire component. The onClick$ syntax is Qwik’s optimizer marker indicating that this event handler should be lazy-loaded, supporting the framework’s resumability architecture.
Computed Values and Effects in Qwik
Qwik provides useComputed$ for creating derived values and useTask$ for side effects that respond to signal changes. Computed signals automatically track their dependencies and recalculate only when necessary, while tasks enable integration with external systems, APIs, and browser APIs. Here’s an advanced example demonstrating these concepts:
import { component$, useSignal, useComputed$, useTask$ } from '@builder.io/qwik';
export default component$(() => {
const firstName = useSignal('');
const lastName = useSignal('');
// Computed signal - automatically updates when dependencies change
const fullName = useComputed$(() => {
return `${firstName.value} ${lastName.value}`.trim();
});
// Effect that runs when fullName changes
useTask$(({ track }) => {
track(() => fullName.value);
if (fullName.value) {
console.log('Full name updated:', fullName.value);
// Could trigger API calls, analytics, etc.
}
});
return (
<div>
<input
type="text"
value={firstName.value}
onInput$={(e) => firstName.value = e.target.value}
placeholder="First Name"
/>
<input
type="text"
value={lastName.value}
onInput$={(e) => lastName.value = e.target.value}
placeholder="Last Name"
/>
<p>Full Name: {fullName.value || 'N/A'}</p>
</div>
);
});
The useComputed$ hook creates a memoized derived value that only recalculates when its source signals change, preventing unnecessary computations. The useTask$ hook establishes side effects with explicit dependency tracking through the track() function, giving developers fine control over when effects execute while maintaining Qwik’s lazy-loading capabilities and resumability guarantees.
Qwik’s Unique Serialization Capabilities
One of Qwik’s most powerful features is its ability to serialize application state, including signal values, into HTML attributes. This enables true resumability where the application can pick up exactly where the server left off without re-executing initialization logic. When a user interacts with a Qwik application, only the code necessary for that specific interaction gets downloaded and executed, dramatically reducing initial JavaScript payload and time-to-interactive metrics.
This architecture makes Qwik particularly valuable for content-heavy sites, e-commerce platforms, and applications where fast initial page load is critical for user engagement and conversion rates. The combination of Signals in JavaScript with resumability creates applications that feel instant to users while maintaining complex interactive functionality that activates on-demand rather than upfront.
Solid Signals: Compile-Time Optimization and Runtime Performance
Solid pioneered the modern Signals pattern in JavaScript frameworks, demonstrating that fine-grained reactivity could deliver exceptional performance without the overhead of virtual DOM diffing. Solid’s approach emphasizes compile-time optimizations that transform JSX into highly efficient reactive statements, creating direct bindings between signals and DOM updates that execute with minimal runtime overhead.
Creating Reactive State with Solid Signals
Solid uses the createSignal function to establish reactive state, which returns a getter-setter pair following a functional programming pattern. This API design makes reactivity explicit and enables Solid’s compiler to optimize reactive dependencies at build time. Here’s a practical example:
import { createSignal } from 'solid-js';
function Counter() {
const [count, setCount] = createSignal(0);
const [step, setStep] = createSignal(1);
const increment = () => setCount(count() + step());
const decrement = () => setCount(count() - step());
return (
Count: {count()}
Step Size: {step()}
<button onClick={increment}>+{step()}</button>
<button onClick={decrement}>-{step()}</button>
<input
type="range"
min="1"
max="10"
value={step()}
onInput={(e) => setStep(parseInt(e.target.value))}
/>
</div>
);
}
Notice how Solid’s Signals in JavaScript use function calls to access values (count()) rather than property access (count.value). This functional approach enables the compiler to detect reactive reads during template compilation, creating optimized reactive bindings. The setter function returned from createSignal can accept either a new value or an updater function, providing flexibility for different update patterns.
Derived State with createMemo
Solid’s createMemo function creates computed values that automatically track dependencies and cache results until dependencies change. Memos are essential for expensive computations derived from signals, preventing redundant calculations and improving performance. Here’s an advanced example demonstrating memo usage:
JavaScript (Solid)
import { createSignal, createMemo } from 'solid-js';
function ShoppingCart() {
const [items, setItems] = createSignal([
{ id: 1, name: 'Laptop', price: 999, quantity: 1 },
{ id: 2, name: 'Mouse', price: 29, quantity: 2 },
{ id: 3, name: 'Keyboard', price: 79, quantity: 1 }
]);
const [discountRate, setDiscountRate] = createSignal(0);
// Memoized subtotal calculation
const subtotal = createMemo(() => {
return items().reduce((sum, item) => {
return sum + (item.price * item.quantity);
}, 0);
});
// Memoized discount amount
const discountAmount = createMemo(() => {
return subtotal() * (discountRate() / 100);
});
// Memoized total
const total = createMemo(() => {
return subtotal() - discountAmount();
});
const updateQuantity = (id, newQuantity) => {
setItems(items().map(item =>
item.id === id ? { ...item, quantity: newQuantity } : item
));
};
return (
Shopping Cart
{items().map(item => (
<div key={item.id}>
<span>{item.name} - ${item.price}</span>
<input
type="number"
value={item.quantity}
onChange={(e) => updateQuantity(item.id, parseInt(e.target.value))}
min="0"
/>
</div>
))}
<div>
<label>
Discount: {discountRate()}%
<input
type="range"
min="0"
max="50"
value={discountRate()}
onInput={(e) => setDiscountRate(parseInt(e.target.value))}
/>
</label>
</div>
<div>
<p>Subtotal: ${subtotal().toFixed(2)}</p>
<p>Discount: -${discountAmount().toFixed(2)}</p>
<h3>Total: ${total().toFixed(2)}</h3>
</div>
</div>
);
}
This example demonstrates how createMemo creates a chain of derived computations where each memo only recalculates when its specific dependencies change. When an item quantity updates, only the subtotal memo recalculates, which then triggers recalculation of discount and total. This fine-grained reactivity ensures optimal performance even with complex derived state calculations.
Effects and Side Effect Management in Solid
Solid provides createEffect for side effects that should run when dependencies change. Unlike memos which return values, effects are purely for side effects like DOM manipulation, API calls, or synchronization with external systems. Here’s a practical implementation:
JavaScript (Solid)
import { createSignal, createEffect, onCleanup } from 'solid-js';
function RealTimeSearch() {
const [searchQuery, setSearchQuery] = createSignal('');
const [results, setResults] = createSignal([]);
const [loading, setLoading] = createSignal(false);
createEffect(() => {
const query = searchQuery();
if (!query) {
setResults([]);
return;
}
setLoading(true);
// Debounce API calls
const timeoutId = setTimeout(async () => {
try {
const response = await fetch(
`https://api.example.com/search?q=${encodeURIComponent(query)}`
);
const data = await response.json();
setResults(data.results);
} catch (error) {
console.error('Search failed:', error);
setResults([]);
} finally {
setLoading(false);
}
}, 300);
// Cleanup function
onCleanup(() => clearTimeout(timeoutId));
});
return (
setSearchQuery(e.target.value)}
/>
{loading() && <p>Searching...</p>}
<ul>
{results().map(result => (
<li key={result.id}>{result.title}</li>
))}
</ul>
</div>
);
}
The createEffect function automatically tracks dependencies by detecting which signals are accessed during its execution. The onCleanup function registers cleanup logic that runs before the effect re-executes or when the component unmounts, perfect for canceling pending operations or cleaning up subscriptions. This pattern enables robust side effect management while maintaining the reactivity guarantees of Signals in JavaScript.
Comparing Qwik and Solid Signals: Architecture and Performance
While both Qwik and Solid leverage Signals for fine-grained reactivity, their architectural philosophies and optimization strategies differ significantly. Understanding these differences helps developers choose the right framework for specific use cases and performance requirements. Let’s explore the key distinctions through detailed comparisons and performance analysis.
API Design and Developer Experience
Qwik uses property-based access (signal.value) for reading and writing signals, which feels more familiar to developers coming from object-oriented programming backgrounds. Solid uses function-based access (signal() for reading, setSignal() for writing), which aligns with functional programming principles and enables more aggressive compiler optimizations through static analysis of function calls in JSX templates.
Feature
Qwik Signals
Solid Signals
Access Pattern
signal.value
signal() / setSignal()
Primary Goal
Resumability & lazy loading
Runtime performance
Hydration
Zero hydration
Traditional hydration
Code Loading
Lazy by default
Eager by default
Serialization
Built-in state serialization
Manual if needed
Bundle Size
Minimal initial bundle
Small but complete runtime
Best Use Case
Content-heavy sites, e-commerce
Interactive apps, dashboards
Performance Characteristics and Benchmarks
Both frameworks excel in performance benchmarks, consistently outperforming virtual DOM frameworks in update speed and memory efficiency. Solid typically shows the fastest update performance in synthetic benchmarks due to its compile-time optimizations and minimal runtime overhead. Qwik excels in real-world metrics like Time to Interactive (TTI) and First Input Delay (FID) because of its lazy loading architecture that defers JavaScript execution until necessary.
For applications where initial page load speed is critical—such as content marketing sites, blogs, and e-commerce product pages—Qwik’s resumability provides measurable advantages in Core Web Vitals. For highly interactive applications where users perform frequent state updates after initial load—such as dashboards, data visualization tools, and collaborative applications—Solid’s optimized reactivity system delivers exceptional runtime performance with minimal overhead.
Ecosystem and Production Readiness
Solid has a more mature ecosystem with extensive documentation, established patterns, and production deployments across various industries. The framework has been battle-tested in high-traffic applications and offers comprehensive tooling including dev tools, testing utilities, and integration with popular libraries. Qwik represents a newer approach with rapidly growing adoption, particularly among developers focused on optimal initial loading performance and applications targeting emerging markets with slower network conditions.
Both frameworks support TypeScript fully, provide excellent developer tooling, and integrate well with modern build systems. The choice between them often comes down to specific project requirements: prioritize Qwik for content-first applications where initial load performance is paramount, or choose Solid for highly interactive applications where runtime performance and developer ergonomics take precedence. Many development teams find value in exploring both frameworks to understand how Signals in JavaScript can optimize different types of applications.
Practical Implementation Patterns and Best Practices
Successfully implementing Signals in JavaScript requires understanding not just the API surface but also the patterns and practices that lead to maintainable, performant applications. This section explores real-world implementation strategies, common pitfalls, and optimization techniques applicable to both Qwik and Solid frameworks.
State Organization and Architecture
Unlike centralized state management solutions like Redux, Signals encourage localized state management where state lives close to where it’s used. However, shared state still requires thoughtful architecture. Both Qwik and Solid support context-based state sharing, and developers can create custom stores or state management utilities built on Signals primitives. Here’s a pattern for creating a reusable store in Solid:
JavaScript (Solid Store Pattern)
import { createSignal, createMemo } from 'solid-js';
function createTodoStore() {
const [todos, setTodos] = createSignal([]);
const [filter, setFilter] = createSignal('all');
const filteredTodos = createMemo(() => {
const allTodos = todos();
const currentFilter = filter();
if (currentFilter === 'completed') {
return allTodos.filter(todo => todo.completed);
}
if (currentFilter === 'active') {
return allTodos.filter(todo => !todo.completed);
}
return allTodos;
});
const stats = createMemo(() => {
const allTodos = todos();
return {
total: allTodos.length,
completed: allTodos.filter(t => t.completed).length,
active: allTodos.filter(t => !t.completed).length
};
});
const addTodo = (text) => {
setTodos([...todos(), {
id: Date.now(),
text,
completed: false,
createdAt: new Date().toISOString()
}]);
};
const toggleTodo = (id) => {
setTodos(todos().map(todo =>
todo.id === id ? { ...todo, completed: !todo.completed } : todo
));
};
const deleteTodo = (id) => {
setTodos(todos().filter(todo => todo.id !== id));
};
const clearCompleted = () => {
setTodos(todos().filter(todo => !todo.completed));
};
return {
todos,
filter,
setFilter,
filteredTodos,
stats,
addTodo,
toggleTodo,
deleteTodo,
clearCompleted
};
}
// Usage in components
function TodoApp() {
const store = createTodoStore();
return (
);
}
This pattern creates a reusable store that encapsulates state, derived values, and actions. The store returns an object containing signals, memos, and functions that components can use without needing to understand the implementation details. This approach scales well for medium to large applications while maintaining the performance benefits of fine-grained reactivity throughout the state management layer.
Optimizing Performance with Batched Updates
While Signals automatically optimize updates, situations arise where multiple signal updates should be batched to prevent intermediate states from triggering effects or UI updates. Both frameworks provide batching mechanisms. In Solid, use batch() to group multiple updates:
JavaScript (Solid Batching)
import { createSignal, batch, createEffect } from 'solid-js';
function FormExample() {
const [firstName, setFirstName] = createSignal('');
const [lastName, setLastName] = createSignal('');
const [email, setEmail] = createSignal('');
// This effect only runs once per batch instead of three times
createEffect(() => {
console.log('Form data changed:', {
firstName: firstName(),
lastName: lastName(),
email: email()
});
});
const loadUserData = (userData) => {
// Without batch, the effect would run three times
batch(() => {
setFirstName(userData.firstName);
setLastName(userData.lastName);
setEmail(userData.email);
});
};
const resetForm = () => {
batch(() => {
setFirstName('');
setLastName('');
setEmail('');
});
};
return (
);
}
Batching becomes particularly important when performing bulk updates, such as loading data from APIs, processing arrays of items, or responding to user actions that modify multiple pieces of state. By batching updates, you ensure effects and derived computations run once with the final state rather than multiple times with intermediate states, improving both performance and preventing inconsistent states from being observable.
Integration with External Libraries and APIs
Integrating Signals in JavaScript with external libraries, browser APIs, and third-party services requires understanding how to bridge imperative APIs with reactive primitives. Here’s a comprehensive example demonstrating integration with the Intersection Observer API:
JavaScript (Solid + Intersection Observer)
import { createSignal, onMount, onCleanup } from 'solid-js';
function LazyImage(props) {
let imageRef;
const [isVisible, setIsVisible] = createSignal(false);
const [isLoaded, setIsLoaded] = createSignal(false);
onMount(() => {
const observer = new IntersectionObserver(
(entries) => {
entries.forEach(entry => {
if (entry.isIntersecting) {
setIsVisible(true);
observer.disconnect();
}
});
},
{
rootMargin: '50px',
threshold: 0.01
}
);
if (imageRef) {
observer.observe(imageRef);
}
onCleanup(() => observer.disconnect());
});
return (
{isVisible() && (
setIsLoaded(true)}
style={{
opacity: isLoaded() ? 1 : 0,
transition: 'opacity 0.3s'
}}
/>
)}
);
}
function ImageGallery() {
const images = [
{ id: 1, src: 'https://example.com/image1.jpg', alt: 'Image 1' },
{ id: 2, src: 'https://example.com/image2.jpg', alt: 'Image 2' },
{ id: 3, src: 'https://example.com/image3.jpg', alt: 'Image 3' }
];
return (
{images.map(image => (
))}
);
}
This pattern demonstrates how to wrap imperative browser APIs in reactive primitives. The Intersection Observer monitors when elements enter the viewport, updating signals that trigger image loading. The cleanup function ensures the observer is properly disconnected when components unmount, preventing memory leaks. This approach works equally well for integrating other APIs like Web Workers, WebSockets, or third-party SDKs.
Real-World Use Cases and Production Applications
Understanding how Signals in JavaScript perform in production environments helps developers make informed technology choices. Both Qwik and Solid have been deployed in various high-traffic applications, each demonstrating the practical benefits of fine-grained reactivity in different contexts. Let’s explore specific use cases where Signals-based frameworks excel and provide measurable advantages over traditional approaches.
E-Commerce and Product Catalogs
E-commerce platforms benefit tremendously from Qwik’s resumability architecture combined with Signals. Product listing pages often contain hundreds of products with interactive elements like filters, sorting, add-to-cart buttons, and quick-view modals. Traditional frameworks load all interactivity code upfront, even for elements users never interact with. Qwik’s lazy loading ensures code only downloads when users actually click filters or add items to cart, dramatically reducing initial JavaScript payload and improving Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) metrics.
For Indian e-commerce companies targeting tier-2 and tier-3 cities where 3G connections remain common, this architecture directly impacts conversion rates. Studies show that every 100ms improvement in load time can increase conversion by 1%, making Qwik’s approach financially significant for businesses operating at scale. The combination of server-side rendering for initial content and progressive JavaScript loading for interactivity creates optimal user experiences across varying network conditions.
Real-Time Dashboards and Analytics
Solid excels in real-time dashboard applications where frequent data updates must render efficiently without causing jank or dropped frames. Financial trading platforms, IoT monitoring systems, and analytics dashboards often update dozens of metrics simultaneously. Solid’s fine-grained reactivity ensures only the specific chart elements, table cells, or indicators that changed receive DOM updates, maintaining smooth 60fps rendering even with high-frequency updates.
A practical example is a stock trading dashboard where price updates stream via WebSocket. With traditional frameworks, each price update might trigger re-renders of entire component trees. With Solid Signals, each price cell connects directly to its signal, updating independently without affecting neighboring components. This architectural difference becomes critical when handling hundreds of concurrent price streams, making the difference between a responsive interface and one that feels sluggish under load.
Content Management and Publishing Platforms
Content-heavy platforms like blogs, news sites, and documentation portals benefit from both frameworks but for different aspects. Qwik shines for public-facing pages where reader experience matters most—article pages load instantly with minimal JavaScript while maintaining interactive features like comments, sharing, and reading progress indicators. Solid works well for admin interfaces and content editors where writers interact with rich text editors, media libraries, and preview systems that require responsive state management.
For developers building on platforms like MERNStackDev, understanding these tradeoffs helps choose appropriate technologies for different parts of the application. A hybrid approach using Qwik for public content delivery and Solid for administrative interfaces can provide optimal performance across the entire platform while maintaining consistent reactive programming patterns based on Signals throughout the codebase.
Frequently Asked Questions About Signals in JavaScript
What are Signals in JavaScript and why are they important?
Signals in JavaScript represent a reactive programming primitive that enables fine-grained reactivity in modern web applications. They automatically track dependencies and update only the specific parts of the UI that depend on changed data, eliminating unnecessary re-renders and significantly improving application performance compared to traditional virtual DOM diffing approaches used in frameworks like React. Signals provide a foundation for building highly responsive applications with minimal overhead, making them increasingly important as web applications grow more complex and performance expectations rise across all devices and network conditions.
How do Qwik Signals differ from Solid Signals?
While both Qwik and Solid implement Signals for fine-grained reactivity, Qwik Signals are designed with resumability in mind, allowing the framework to serialize and resume application state without re-executing JavaScript. Solid Signals focus purely on compile-time optimization and runtime efficiency. Qwik emphasizes zero JavaScript execution on initial load, while Solid prioritizes minimal runtime overhead with excellent developer experience through reactive primitives. The API differs too—Qwik uses property access (signal.value) while Solid uses function calls (signal()). Choose Qwik for content-first applications prioritizing initial load speed, or Solid for highly interactive applications where runtime performance is paramount.
Can I use Signals in existing React projects?
Yes, you can integrate Signals into React projects using libraries like @preact/signals-react or implementing custom Signal solutions. However, the integration won’t provide the same level of optimization as native Signal-based frameworks because React’s reconciliation model still triggers component re-renders. For maximum benefit, consider using frameworks built around Signals like Qwik, Solid, or Preact with Signals from the ground up. If you’re committed to React but want Signal benefits, @preact/signals-react offers the best compromise, though you’ll need to restructure components to leverage fine-grained reactivity effectively and may still encounter limitations around React’s rendering model.
What performance benefits do Signals provide over useState in React?
Signals provide significant performance advantages by eliminating unnecessary component re-renders. When state changes with useState, React re-renders the entire component tree, even if only a small portion needs updating. Signals track dependencies at a granular level, updating only the specific DOM nodes that depend on changed values. This results in faster updates, reduced memory consumption, and better performance especially in complex applications with frequent state changes. Benchmarks show Signal-based frameworks like Solid performing updates 5-10x faster than React in scenarios with extensive state updates, with memory usage often 50% lower due to eliminated virtual DOM overhead and reduced garbage collection pressure.
How do I implement derived state with Signals?
Derived state in Signals is implemented through computed values or effects that automatically recalculate when their dependencies change. In Solid, you use createMemo to create computed values, while Qwik provides useComputed$. These derived signals only recalculate when their source signals change, and they automatically track dependencies without manual specification. This makes complex state derivations efficient and easy to maintain while preserving reactivity throughout the application. For example, a shopping cart total can be a computed signal derived from item prices and quantities—when any item updates, only the total recalculates, and only UI elements displaying the total re-render, maintaining optimal performance.
